Proof

What this looks like in practice

Retail health

16-store optometry group

Discovery workshopUnified data layerAttribution

The problem

Around $600,000 a year of digital spend with no reliable attribution, figures nobody trusted, silent system failures, and more than ten logins per store.

What we did

One on-site workshop day produced a validated architecture map, a force-ranked opportunity list and two fixed-price scopes. Discovery surfaced eight months of work built against the wrong service, a three-month silent booking-email outage, and patient data leaving Australia.

Where it landed

A $5,000 workshop led to scoped foundation work. The first data pipeline was proven end to end and deployed. A multi-phase platform roadmap followed.

Line drawing of round glasses: tangled lines in one lens, a grass mark in the other

Disability services

NDIS provider, 30+ support workers

DiscoveryMicrosoft 365Roadmap

The problem

Roughly $150,000 a year of manual reporting labour. Twenty to thirty percent of shift notes going missing undetected. Incident reports with no alerting behind them.

What we did

Discovery produced a before-and-after table with about $125,000 a year of addressable savings, and a phased roadmap built on the Microsoft stack they already pay for. No replatforming. No rip-and-replace.

Where it landed

A discovery engagement and a proposed phased roadmap. Gap detection on shift notes, incident alerting, and plain-English answers from their own data sit on that roadmap as later work. Each phase priced separately so they could stop at any point.

Line drawing of a grid with a single grass-marked square

Start with one conversation

If one of these problems sounds like yours, tell us. We will say whether we have done this kind of work, and what a first fixed piece would be.